Utility of the 13 C-pantoprazole breath test as a CYP2C19 phenotyping probe for children.

The 13 C-pantoprazole breath test (PAN-BT) is a safe, noninvasive, in vivo CYP2C19 phenotyping probe for adults. Our objective was to evaluate PAN-BT performance in children, with a focus on discriminating individuals who, according to guidelines from the Clinical Pharmacology Implementation Consortium (CPIC), would benefit from starting dose escalation versus reduction for proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). Children (n = 65, 6-17 years) genotyped for CYP2C19 variants *2, *3, *4, and *17 received a single oral dose of 13 C-pantoprazole. Plasma concentrations of pantoprazole and its metabolites, and changes in exhaled 13 CO2 (termed delta-over-baseline or DOB), were measured 10 times over 8 h using high performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection and spectrophotometry, respectively. Pharmacokinetic parameters of interest were generated and DOB features derived using feature engineering for the first 180 min postadministration. DOB features, age, sex, and obesity status were used to run bootstrap analysis at each timepoint (Ti ) independently. For each iteration, stratified samples were drawn based on genotype prevalence in the original cohort. A random forest was trained, and predictive performance of PAN-BT was evaluated. Strong discriminating ability for CYP2C19 intermediate versus normal/rapid metabolizer phenotype was noted at DOBT30 min (mean sensitivity: 0.522, specificity: 0.784), with consistent model outperformance over a random or a stratified classifier approach at each timepoint (p < 0.001). With additional refinement and investigation, the test could become a useful and convenient dosing tool in clinic to help identify children who would benefit most from PPI dose escalation versus dose reduction, in accordance with CPIC guidelines.

Identification of the New In Vivo Metabolites of Ilaprazole in Rat Plasma after Oral Administration by LC-MS: In Silico Prediction of the H+/K+-ATPase Inhibitor.

Ilaprazole is a proton pump inhibitor used to treat digestive diseases. In this study, blood samples were collected after oral administration of ilaprazole and prepared by liquid-liquid extraction. The metabolites of ilaprazole were detected by liquid chromatography-high-resolution mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS) and LC-MSn. A total of twelve in vivo metabolites were detected in rat plasma and six new metabolites of ilaprazole, including one reductive metabolite with sulfide (M3), two hydroxylated metabolites with sulfoxide (M7 and M8), and three oxidative metabolites with sulfone (M9, M11, and M12), were identified. The possible metabolic pathways of ilaprazole and the fragmentation behaviors of its metabolites were elucidated. The result of the in silico prediction indicates that all the new metabolites showed the potential ability to inhibit H+/K+-ATPase activity.

The study of intestinal absorption and biodistribution in vivo of proton pump inhibitors.

The major therapeutic strategy for acid-related gastrointestinal diseases in clinic is to reduce the excretion of gastric acid by oral administration of proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs). However, it is quite a challenge to study the oral absorption behaviors of PPIs considering their extreme instability under gastrointestinal environment. As a result, little information has been reported on PPI oral absorption so far, hindering the further development of PPI-contained oral preparations. Here, we first investigated the degradation rate of three representative PPIs, including ilaprazole, ilaprazole sodium and rabeprazole sodium. Then a modified in situ intestine absorption method in rat was established: through the temperature control by the heat exchangers, the perfusate was kept at physiological temperature only when passing through the intestine while it was maintained at 4 °C outside the intestine. Therefore PPIs could maintained sufficiently high stability under proper temperature control. Our data demonstrated that both ilaprazole and ilaprazole sodium exhibited significantly higher absorption efficiency than rabeprazole sodium did through the comparison of their apparent permeability coefficients and steady-state plasma concentrations after perfusion in the duodenum, jejunum, ileum and colon, mainly attributing to their more suitable oil-water partition coefficient. The duodenum could be the best site for the oral absorption of PPIs. Ilaprazole outperformed its sodium salt form with its stable absorption behavior in tested four intestinal segments. Furthermore, after intravenous or oral administration, ilaprazole exhibited a longer residence time and a higher accumulation in the stomach than in most of other tissues/organs. However, it was also found that the accumulation was heterogeneous and mainly located in mucosa cells of the stomach. Our further study indicated that there was no significant difference on the oral absorption efficiency of ilaprazole between female and male rats but ilaprazole underwent a faster metabolism in male rats after oral absorption. Our study provided a valuable guidance for the design of oral formulation and the optimization of PPI-contained formulations.

Effects of genetic polymorphisms on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of proton pump inhibitors.

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are used widely for the treatment of acid-related disorders. Despite their excellent efficacy and tolerance, the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of PPIs are affected by each patient's CYP2C19 and gastric H+,K+-ATPase genotype. The aim of this review was to analyze the effect of genetic polymorphisms on the pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties of PPIs. The gastric acid-suppressive effect of PPIs is affected by both gastric H+,K+-ATPase and CYP2C19 polymorphisms, although gastric H+,K+-ATPase polymorphisms may have larger effects. Ilaprazole and rabeprazole show relatively small differences in the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties and clinical efficacy among the different CYP2C19 genotypes. Compared with oral administration, the intravenous infusion of PPIs is less affected by CYP2C19 polymorphism. At the same dose, each enantiomer has less variation among different CYP2C19 genotypes than a racemate mixture.

Efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of ilaprazole infusion in healthy subjects and patients with esomeprazole as positive control.

AIMS: The objectives were to investigate the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and safety of ilaprazole infusion in healthy subjects and patients with esomeprazole as positive control, and then recommend the dosage regimen for Phase 2b/3 studies. METHODS: Three clinical studies were performed. First, 16 healthy subjects received infusion of ilaprazole 30 mg or esomeprazole 80 mg. Second, 12 healthy subjects received ilaprazole 20 mg followed by 10 mg once daily for 2 days. Finally, 20 patients with duodenal ulcers received ilaprazole 20 mg followed by 10 mg for 2 days or esomeprazole 40 mg twice daily for 3 days. Serial blood samples were collected and intragastric pH was recorded. RESULTS: The mean percentages time of intragastric pH >6 was 63.6 and 51.7% for healthy subjects after receiving ilaprazole 30 mg and esomeprazole 80 mg. Linear pharmacokinetics was observed when the dose was increased to 30 mg but the effect was saturated. Ilaprazole 20 mg followed by 10 mg for 2 days provided higher plasma exposure in healthy subjects than patients, but the effect was comparable. After multiple administrations, ilaprazole provided similar effect to esomeprazole. Ilaprazole infusion was safe and well tolerated without serious adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Ilaprazole provided comparable effect of pH control to esomeprazole, with lower dose and fewer times of administration. There was no significant difference of ilaprazole between healthy subjects and patients regarding intragastric acid inhibition. A loading dose of ilaprazole 20 mg followed by 10 mg once daily for 2 days was recommended for Phase 2b/3 studies.

A Population-Based Pharmacokinetic Model Approach to Pantoprazole Dosing for Obese Children and Adolescents.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Pharmacokinetic data for proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), acid-suppression drugs commonly prescribed to children, are lacking for obese children who are at greatest risk for acid-related disease. In a recent multi-center investigation, we demonstrated decreased, total body weight adjusted, apparent clearance (CL/F) of the PPI pantoprazole for obese children compared with their non-obese peers. Subsequently, we developed a population-based pharmacokinetic (PopPK) model to characterize pantoprazole disposition and evaluated appropriate pantoprazole dosing strategies for obese pediatric patients, using simulation. METHODS: Pharmacokinetic data from the only prospective study of PPIs in obese children (aged 6-17 years; n = 40) included 273 pantoprazole and 256 pantoprazole-sulfone plasma concentrations, after single oral-dose administration, and were used for pantoprazole model development and covariate analysis (NONMEM®). Model evaluation was performed via bootstrapping and predictive checks, and the final model was applied to simulate systemic pantoprazole exposures for common dosing scenarios. RESULTS: A two-compartment PopPK model, which included CYP2C19 genotype and total body weight, provided the best fit. Resultant, typical, weight-normalized pantoprazole parameter estimates were different than previously reported for children or adults, with significantly reduced pantoprazole CL/F for obese children. Of the dosing scenarios evaluated, the weight-tiered approach, approved by the US Food and Drug Administration, achieved pantoprazole exposures [area under the curve (AUC0-∞)] within ranges previously reported as therapeutic, without over- or under-prediction for obese children. CONCLUSIONS: Our data argue against empiric dose escalation of PPIs for obese children and support current FDA-approved pediatric weight-tiered dosing for pantoprazole; however, 3- to 5-fold inter-individual variability in pantoprazole AUC0-∞ remained using this dosing approach.

Biotransformation of Ilaprazole in Human Liver Microsomes and Human: Role of CYP3A4 in Ilaprazole Clearance and Drug-Drug Interaction.

Ilaprazole is a new proton pump inhibitor and is currently marketed in China and South Korea for the treatment of gastric and duodenal ulcer. Ilaprazole has a favorable long half-life and minimal pharmacokinetic variability associated with CYP2C19 polymorphism. Sulfoxide oxidation of ilaprazole is catalyzed mainly by CYP3A4. Thus, it has been widely accepted that CYP3A4 plays a major role in the clearance of ilaprazole in humans. However, absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion data of radiolabeled ilaprazole in humans are not available. The primary goal of this study was to determine if sulfoxide oxidation is a major metabolic pathway of ilaprazole in humans. Metabolite profiles of ilaprazole, ilaprazole sulfide, and ilaprazole sulfone in human liver microsomes (HLMs) were characterized and quantitively analyzed by liquid chromatography (LC)/UV/high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS). Moreover, metabolites of ilaprazole in human urine and feces were detected and identified by LC-HRMS. The results revealed that sulfoxide reduction to ilaprazole sulfide rather than sulfoxide oxidation was the major biotransformation pathway in HLMs. Sulfoxide reduction also occurred in HLMs without NADPH or in deactivated HLMs. Ilaprazole sulfide and its multiple oxidative metabolites were major drug-related components in human urine and feces, where there were no ilaprazole sulfone and its metabolites. A small amount of the parent drug was found in feces. Thus, we propose that nonenzymatic sulfoxide reduction rather than CYP3A4-medidated sulfoxide oxidation is the major metabolic clearance pathway of ilaprazole in humans. Consequently, it is predicted that ilaprazole has no significant drug-drug interaction via CYP3A4 inhibition or induction by a coadministered drug.

Pharmacokinetic drug interaction and safety after coadministration of clarithromycin, amoxicillin, and ilaprazole: a randomised, open-label, one-way crossover, two parallel sequences study.

PURPOSE: Ilaprazole, the latest proton pump inhibitor, can be used with clarithromycin and amoxicillin as a triple therapy regimen for eradicating Helicobacter pylori. The aim of this study was to evaluate pharmacokinetic drug interactions and safety profiles after coadministration of clarithromycin, amoxicillin, and ilaprazole. METHODS: A randomised, open-label, one-way crossover, two parallel sequences study was conducted in 32 healthy subjects. In part 1, the subjects received a single dose of ilaprazole 10 mg in period 1 and clarithromycin 500 mg and amoxicillin 1000 mg twice daily for 6 days in period 2. In part 2, the subjects received clarithromycin 500 mg and amoxicillin 1000 mg once in period 1 and ilaprazole 10 mg twice daily for 6 days in period 2. In both sequences, the three drugs were coadministrated once on day 5 in period 2. Pharmacokinetic evaluations of ilaprazole (part 1), and clarithromycin and amoxicillin (part 2) were conducted. RESULTS: Twenty-eight subjects completed the study. For ilaprazole, the peak concentration (Cmax) slightly decreased from 479 (ilaprazole alone) to 446 ng/mL (triple therapy) [Geometric least square mean ratio (90% confidence interval), 0.93 (0.70-1.22)]. The area under the concentration-time curve from 0 h to the last measurable concentration (AUClast) slightly increased from 3301 to 3538 µg·h/mL [1.07 (0.85-1.35)]. For clarithromycin, the Cmax slightly decreased from 1.87 to 1.72 µg/mL [0.90 (0.70-1.15)], and AUClast slightly increased from 14.6 to 16.5 µg·h/mL [1.09 (0.87-1.37)]. For amoxicillin, the Cmax slightly decreased from 9.37 to 8.14 µg/mL [0.86 (0.74-1.01)], and AUClast slightly decreased from 27.9 to 26.7 µg·h/mL [0.98 (0.83-1.16)]. These changes in the PK parameters of each drug were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: The coadministration of ilaprazole, clarithromycin, and amoxicillin was tolerable and did not cause a significant PK drug interaction. Thus, a triple therapy regimen comprising ilaprazole, clarithromycin, and amoxicillin may be an option for the eradication of H. pylori. Clinicaltrials.gov number: NCT02998437.

Safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of S-(-)-pantoprazole sodium injections after single and multiple intravenous doses in healthy Chinese subjects.

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of S-(-)-pantoprazole (PPZ) sodium injections following single and multiple intravenous doses in healthy Chinese subjects. METHODS: The dosage groups were set as followed: 20 mg of single and multiple intravenous administration of S-(-)-PPZ, 40 mg of single and multiple intravenous administration of S-(-)-PPZ or pantoprazole, and 80 mg of single dosage group of S-(-)-PPZ. Subjects were sampled for pharmacokinetic analysis and were monitored for 24-h intragastric pH prior to and 48-h intragastric pH after administration for the pharmacodynamic study. The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters were compared between S-(-)-PPZ and PPZ. Safety was evaluated on the basis of adverse events, vital signs, laboratory tests, and physical examination. RESULTS: All adverse events were mild and of limited duration. Maximum plasma concentration and area under the concentration-time curve for S-(-)-PPZ were dose proportional over the range of 20-80 mg following a single intravenous administration. Elimination rate constant and half-life observed statistical difference from a single dose to multiple doses in 40 mg of S-(-)-PPZ groups. After administration of a single dose, the mean 24-h intragastric pH value was observed higher in 80-mg group than in 40- and 20-mg groups. Slightly increase of intragastric pH was found after a single dose of 40 mg S-(-)-PPZ than 40 mg PPZ; however, the differences were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Twice daily of 40 mg S-(-)-PPZ sodium injections is effective in achieving satisfying acid inhibition. Compared with plasma R-(+)-PPZ levels, most subjects presented more potent and prolonged suppression of gastric acid of S-(-)-PPZ, while a few subjects showed faster metabolic rate of S-(-)-PPZ in vivo.

No Pharmacokinetic Interaction Between the Hepatitis C Virus Inhibitors Elbasvir/Grazoprevir and Famotidine or Pantoprazole.

Use of agents to suppress gastric acid secretion is common among patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. The aims of this open-label, three-period, fixed-sequence study were to evaluate the effect of famotidine and pantoprazole on the pharmacokinetics and safety of elbasvir/grazoprevir fixed-dose combination (FDC) in 16 healthy subjects. Elbasvir and grazoprevir each exhibited similar pharmacokinetics following single-dose administration of elbasvir/grazoprevir with or without famotidine or pantoprazole. Geometric mean ratios (GMRs) of grazoprevir AUC(0,∞), Cmax , and C24 (elbasvir/grazoprevir + famotidine or elbasvir/grazoprevir + pantoprazole vs. elbasvir/grazoprevir) ranged from 0.89-1.17. Similarly, GMRs of elbasvir AUC(0,∞), Cmax , and C24 (elbasvir/grazoprevir + famotidine or elbasvir/grazoprevir + pantoprazole vs. elbasvir/grazoprevir) ranged from 1.02-1.11. These results indicate that gastric acid-reducing agents do not modify the pharmacokinetics of elbasvir or grazoprevir in a clinically relevant manner and may be coadministered with elbasvir/grazoprevir in HCV-infected patients without restriction.

A chiral LC-MS/MS method for the enantioselective determination of R-(+)- and S-(-)-pantoprazole in human plasma and its application to a pharmacokinetic study of S-(-)-pantoprazole sodium injection.

Pantoprazole, a proton pump inhibitor, is clinically used for the treatment of peptic diseases. An enantioselective LC-MS/MS method was developed and validated for the simultaneous determination of pantoprazole enantiomers in human plasma. Pantoprazole enantiomers and the internal standard were extracted from plasma using acetonitrile. Chiral separation was carried on a Chiralpak IE column using the mobile phase consisted of 10 mm ammonium acetate solution containing 0.1% acetic acid-acetonitrile (28 : 72, v/v). MS analysis was performed on an API 4000 mass spectrometer. Multiple reactions monitoring transitions of m/z 384.1→200.1 and 390.1→206.0 were used to quantify pantoprazole enantiomers and internal standard, respectively. For each enantiomer, no apparent matrix effect was found, the calibration curve was linear over 5.00-10,000 ng/mL, the intra- and inter-day precisions were below 10.0%, and the accuracy was within the range of -5.6% to 0.6%. This method was applied to the stereoselective pharmacokinetic studies in human after intravenous administration of S-(-)-pantoprazole sodium injections. No chiral inversion was observed during sample storage, preparation procedure and analysis. While R-(+)-pantoprazole was detected in human plasma with a slightly high concentration, which implied that S-(-)-pantoprazole may convert to R-(+)-pantoprazole in some subjects.

Development of Solid-Phase Extraction and HPLC Method for Simultaneous Estimation of Ilaprazole and Glimepiride in Rat Plasma: Application to Pharmacokinetic Studies.

A novel, simple and mass spectrometry (MS) compatible high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method is reported for the simultaneous estimation of ilaprazole (ILA) and glimepiride (GLM) in rat plasma. The bio-analytical procedure involves extraction of ILA, GLM and internal standard (IS) from rat plasma with a solid-phase extraction (SPE) process. The chromatographic analysis was performed on Waters-600 system using an isocratic mobile phase comprising methanol:water (80:20 % v/v) with pH of water modified to three using formic acid at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min and Kinetex C18 column maintained at 30 ± 1°C. The signals were monitored using a PDA detector set at 225 nm. IS, ILA and GLM eluted at 2.04, 4.7 and 7.4 min, respectively, and the total run time was 10 min. Method validation was performed as per US Food and Drug Administration guidelines and the results met the acceptance criteria. The calibration curve was linear over a concentration range of 10-600 ng/mL (r2 = 0.999). The intra- and inter-day precisions for ILA and GLM were (%RSD values) in the range of 1.52-9.74 and 1.52-11.76%, respectively, in rat plasma. The method was successfully applied in pharmacokinetic studies followed by oral administration of GLM and ILA in rats.

A new pollen-derived microcarrier for pantoprazole delivery.

Plant-derived carriers have emerged as promising materials for drug encapsulation. Especially, sporopollenin microcapsules extracted from diverse pollen species have been proved to be effective drug carriers due to their biocompatibility, homogeneity in size, resistance to harsh chemical conditions and high thermal stability. Here in this study, sporopollenin microcapsules were isolated successfully from the pollens of a common tree (Corylus avellana, the European hazelnut) and used as a carrier for pantoprazole (PaNa) (a proton pump inhibitor). The drug entrapment efficiency was recorded as 29.81%. SEM micrographs clearly showed the drug was loaded into the microcapsules through the apertures of microcapsule and also some drugs were adsorbed on the surface of microcapsules. FT-IR spectra analysis confirmed the drug loading. Thermogravimetric analysis revealed that thermal stability of PaNa was enhanced by encapsulation. In vitro release studies showed that PaNa-loaded sporopollenin microcapsules exhibited better release performance than the control. C. avellana sporopollenin microcapsules can make an efficient carrier for delivery of PaNa.

Effects of Genetic Polymorphisms of Cytochrome P450 Enzymes and MDR1 Transporter on Pantoprazole Metabolism and Helicobacter pylori Eradication.

Pantoprazole is a proton pump inhibitor that is commonly used in the treatment of peptic ulcer disease (PUD) and metabolized by cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes CYP2C19 and CYP3A4. Pantoprazole is a substrate for multi-drug resistance protein 1 (MDR1). Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in CYP2C19, CYP3A4 and MDR1 affect enzyme activity or gene expression of proteins and may alter plasma pantoprazole concentrations and treatment success in PUD. In this study, we aimed to investigate the association between genetic polymorphisms in CYP2C19, CYP3A4 and MDR1 and pharmacokinetics of pantoprazole and therapeutic outcome in patients with either Helicobacter pylori-associated [H.P.(+)]-PUD or [H.P.(+)]-gastritis. The plasma pantoprazole concentrations were determined by using an HPLC method at the third hour after a 40-mg tablet of pantoprazole administration in 194 newly diagnosed patients with either [H.P.(+)]-PUD or [H.P.(+)]-gastritis. Genotyping was performed by using PCR-RFLP and DNA sequencing. Among patients appearing for follow-up examination (n = 105), the eradication rate for H. pylori was 82.8% (n = 87). The median pantoprazole plasma concentrations in poor metabolizers (PM), rapid metabolizers (RM) and ultrarapid metabolizers (URM) were 2.07, 1.69 and 1.28 µg/ml, respectively (p = 0.04). CYP3A4*1G and *22 polymorphisms did not affect plasma pantoprazole concentrations and H. pylori eradication rate. The MDR1 genetic polymorphisms did not affect plasma pantoprazole concentrations. MDR1 3435CC-2677GG-1236CC haplotype carriers had lower H. pylori eradication rate (60%) than the remaining subjects (84.9%) while the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.07). In conclusion, while CYP2C19 genetic polymorphisms significantly affected plasma pantoprazole concentrations, polymorphisms of CYP2C19, CYP3A4 and MDR1 did not affect H. pylori eradication rates.

Stereoselective Pharmacodynamics and Pharmacokinetics of Proton Pump Inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are a group of gastric acid suppressing drugs, they work by irreversibly blocking the H+/K+ ATPase. The structure of PPIs is similar. They all have a similar core with a sulphur atom chiral center combined with different substituent groups. In relation to the sulphur atom chiral center, the pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics are diverse between the racemates and their stereoisomers. But there are no reviews outlining the stereoselective pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics in PPIs. This review aims to compare the differences between the stereoisomers of PPIs in their pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics parameters. And exploring the development directions of PPIs at present. METHODS: We undertook a search of PubMed databases for PPI research literature including reviews, clinical studies, letters and books, in recent 20 years. The citied papers were high quality, which were carefully screened by authors using standard tools. The data of the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics parameters were selected from the retrieved papers, then making generalization and summary. RESULTS: Ninety-three papers were included in the review, mainly from East Asia, America and Europe. All these papers involved the reviews of PPIs, the pharmacodynamics studies of PPIs and the pharmacokinetics studies of PPIs. Finally, omeprazole, lansoprazole, pantoprazole, rebeprazole and pantoprazole with their enantiomers were discussed in this paper. CONCLUSION: The findings of this review confirm the differences of pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics in the racemates and the stereoisomer of PPIs. Providing longer duration, faster time of onset and better nocturnal gastric acid secretion control are the development directions of new generation PPIs. But, due to debate on the necessity and superiority of these new drugs, more validation studies are needed.

High-Throughput Chiral LC-MS/MS Method Using Overlapping Injection Mode for the Determination of Pantoprazole Enantiomers in Human Plasma with Application to Pharmacokinetic Study.

A sensitive and high-throughput chiral liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method was developed and validated for the quantification of R-pantoprazole and S-pantoprazole in human plasma. Sample extraction was carried out by using ethyl acetate liquid-liquid extraction in 96-well plate format. The separation of pantoprazole enantiomers was performed on a CHIRALCEL OJ-RH column and an overlapping injection mode was used to achieve a run time of 5.0 min/sample. The mobile phase consisted of 1) 10 mM ammonium acetate in methanol: acetonitrile (1:1, v/v) and 2) 20 mM ammonium acetate in water. Isocratic elution was used with flow rate at 500 µL/min. The enantiomers were quantified on a triple-quadrupole mass spectrometer under multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode with m/z 382.1/230.0 for pantoprazole and m/z 388.4/230.1 for pantoprazole-d7. Linearity from 20.0 to 5000 ng/mL was established for each enantiomer (r(2)  > 0.99). Extraction recovery ranged from 91.7% to 96.4% for R-pantoprazole and from 92.5% to 96.5% for S-pantoprazole and the IS-normalized matrix factor was 0.98 to 1.07 for R-pantoprazole and S-pantoprazole, respectively. The method was demonstrated with acceptable accuracy, precision, selectivity, and stability and the method was applied to support a pharmacokinetic study of a phase I clinical trial of racemic pantoprazole in healthy Chinese subjects. Chirality 28:569-575, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics and Safety of Multiple-Infusion Ilaprazole in Healthy Chinese Subjects.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Ilaprazole is a novel proton pump inhibitor that provides effective and long lasting inhibition of intragastric acid secretion. The objectives of this study were to investigate the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of intravenous ilaprazole after multiple administrations in healthy Chinese subjects. METHODS: This was an open-label and multiple-dose clinical study. Ten healthy Chinese subjects received 10 mg ilaprazole infusion once daily for 5 days. Helicobacter pylori status was examined. Blood samples were collected and intragastric pH was recorded for 24 h. Safety was assessed throughout the study. RESULTS: There was no accumulation after multiple administrations. The mean steady-state half-life and clearance were comparable to those following single administration. Ilaprazole provided sustainable and significant intragastric pH control in terms of percentage time at pH >4, pH >6 within 24 h and mean 24-h pH values. The pH value within 24 h was affected by Helicobacter pylori infection in subjects with continuous infusion. Intravenous ilaprazole was safe and there were no serious adverse events. CONCLUSION: Intravenous ilaprazole provided stable pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics at a dose of 10 mg once daily for 5 days, and was well tolerated in healthy subjects.

Comparison of Pantoprazole Concentrations in Simultaneous Cerebrospinal Fluid and Serum Samples.

BACKGROUND: Pantoprazole is a proton pump inhibitor drug mainly used for treating peptic diseases. Adverse effects of pantoprazole in the occasional central nervous system (CNS) include headache, vertigo and sleep disturbances. Data in rats suggest that proton pumps are expressed in the inner ear and in the epithelium of the choroid plexus, which would be a potential target to mediate such proton pump inhibitor effects. METHODS: To assess the distribution of pantoprazole into the human CNS despite its low lipophilicity (log p = 0.5), we quantified pantoprazole concentrations by liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry in serum and cerebrospinal fluid retain samples withdrawn simultaneously. Twenty-six sample pairs were obtained from 23 neurological patients with therapeutic administration of pantoprazole prior to sampling. RESULTS: Median (interquartile range) serum concentration of total pantoprazole was 142 ng/ml (30.8-622). Cerebrospinal fluid concentration of total pantoprazole was 2.79 ng/ml (1.59-7.3) and reached 2.0% (1.0-4.5%) of simultaneous serum concentrations. CONCLUSION: This value corresponds to the unbound fraction of pantoprazole in serum reported previously and indicates that pantoprazole CNS concentrations are high enough to exert some effects on possible CNS targets.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of intravenous ilaprazole in healthy subjects after single ascending doses.

1. Ilaprazole is a novel proton pump inhibitor and this is the first study to investigate the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and safety of intravenous ilaprazole in healthy volunteers. 2. In this open-label, single-dose, randomized and four-period crossover study, 16 healthy Chinese subjects received ilaprazole 5, 10 or 20 mg intravenously, or 10 mg orally. Serial blood and urine samples were collected and intragastric pH was recorded within 24 h. The percentage time of intragastric pH > 6 was the major index. Safety was assessed throughout the study. 3. Plasma exposure of intravenous ilaprazole increased proportionally over the dose of 5-20 mg. Clearance and volume of distribution were independent of dose. Ilaprazole was not eliminated through urine and the absolute bioavailability was 55.2%. For the intravenous dose of 5, 10, 20 mg, and oral dose of 10 mg, the mean percentages time of intragastric pH > 6 were 47.3%, 52.8%, 68.2% and 47.5%, respectively. 4. Ilaprazole showed linear pharmacokinetics over the dose of 5-20 mg. Intravenous ilaprazole provided rapid onset of action and the potency of effect were exhibited in a dose-dependent manner. Intravenous ilaprazole was safe and well tolerated except for elevated activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and prothrombin time (PT).

In vitro and in vivo evaluation of drug-drug interaction between dabigatran and proton pump inhibitors.

To quantify the drug-drug interactions between dabigatran etexilate (DE) and proton pump inhibitors (PPI) and in particular the role of P-gp activity modulation. In the first part of the study, efflux ratios of DE were evaluated using the caco-2 cell line in the presence of pantoprazole, omeprazole, rabeprazole, lansoprazole and ciclosporin A (positive control). The two PPI that reduced the efflux ratio of dabigatran to the greatest and least extent, respectively, were used during the second part of the study, comprising a single-centre, randomised, open-label study with an incomplete Latin square design. Nine healthy volunteers received DE (150 mg) alone, DE (150 mg) with the first PPI and DE (150 mg) with the second PPI in randomised sequence. Dabigatran plasma concentration and thrombin time were measured in blood samples withdrawn at 11 time points after each treatment. Models were built using a nonlinear mixed-effect modelling approach. Omeprazole and rabeprazole were the two PPI that reduced the efflux ratio of DE least and most, respectively. The PK model was based on an inverse Gaussian absorption process with one compartment. The relationship between dabigatran concentration and thrombin time was considered linear. Some PK profiles had dramatically low concentration values due to poor absorption. These profiles were clustered using a between subject model mixture with interoccasion variability. The concomitant administration of PPI did not significantly change dabigatran pharmacokinetics. DE is subject to high absorption variability, precluding evaluation of the effect of PPI on its pharmacokinetics.